Fujifilm Business Innovation Docuprint m375 Df vulnerabilities

6 CVEs affecting Fujifilm Business Innovation Docuprint m375 Df, 0 known to be exploited (CISA KEV), with EPSS scores. Latest: CVE-2024-51984, published 2025-06-25.

Highest priority

Known exploited (CISA KEV) first, then by EPSS exploit probability.

CVE-2024-51977, published 2025-06-25. Medium severity, CVSS 5.3. EPSS: 46.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unauthenticated attacker who can access either the HTTP service (TCP port 80), the HTTPS service (TCP port 443), or the IPP service (TCP port 631), can leak several pieces of sensitive information…
CVE-2024-51983, published 2025-06-25. High severity, CVSS 7.5. EPSS: 11.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unauthenticated attacker who can connect to the Web Services feature (HTTP TCP port 80) can issue a WS-Scan SOAP request containing an unexpected JobToken value which will crash the target device.…
CVE-2024-51979, published 2025-06-25. High severity, CVSS 7.2. EPSS: 1.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. An authenticated attacker may trigger a stack based buffer overflow by performing a malformed request to either the HTTP service (TCP port 80), the HTTPS service (TCP port 443), or the IPP service…
CVE-2024-51980, published 2025-06-25. Medium severity, CVSS 5.3. EPSS: 1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This…
CVE-2024-51984, published 2025-06-25. Medium severity, CVSS 6.8. EPSS: 1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. An authenticated attacker can reconfigure the target device to use an external service (such as LDAP or FTP) controlled by the attacker. If an existing password is present for an external service,…
CVE-2024-51981, published 2025-06-25. Medium severity, CVSS 5.3. EPSS: 1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the…